More Content - Including Podcasts

Friday, April 29, 2011

IBM Smarter Systems for a Converged Network

This posting is a two part experiment.
Part one is this is my first posting trying out the BlogPress tool for my iPad, making a posting from a cafe.
Second part of the experiment is that the posting is pretty much my unedited, raw notes from the session.
I'd really like the feedback from my readers to know if getting this format is of value, because in future this will get the blog posted almost immediately. Or would you rather wait a few days for me to format more and pretty it up?
Let me know!

On Apr 26, 2011 I attended this IBM session, marketed for Infrastructure managers with an eye towards data centre consolidation and infrastructure convergence. I noted low attendance at 09:35, the Tuesday after Easter might have been an off date? Anyhow below are my notes taken during the session for whatever value you might all find from them.

Need for a converged infrastructure
Matthew Eastwood, group VP, IDC global platform research
The Research was dated Jan 2011, but statistical data was from Jan 2010.
What's happening at the edge that's reshaping the data centre?
Belief is that customers are looking to achieve more and additional business benefits from IT.
Over 60% of all data centre workload is on x86 platforms, but most data centres have a mixture of platforms at about 38% unix and other.
Rack is the fastest growing format, currently holding 63% of the x86 Market share, blade is at 21%, tower at 16.
Server spend on enterprise caliber data centres is down 12 pts, SMB and Mega DC are up.
Trends, efficiency, complexity, elastic scaling, off premise.
Data growth, transactions (8.4 x growth), and 10G ports (12.4x) growth by 2013 from 2005.
Customer surveys show customers feel that convergences means server and storage and virtualisation.
Average virtualisation rate is 30%, expect 50% in 12 months
Numbers of VM hosts not increasing, but number of VMs is increasing quickly year over year, ergo, new systems being deployed are being deployed as virtual, not physical.
Server hardware spending is being optimised as CapEx, but OpEx spending is getting out of control due to lack of Virtual system management. Same message we heard from Microsoft 2 weeks ago.
Consider 25 servers per admin, 35 VMs per admin
increased focus on automation and optimisation
Industry is beginning to move from consolidation focus to assured computing, and not yet ready for the maturity required for private cloud, 80% of customersbare working in these areas, only 5 in private cloud.
CMDB required to move to assured computing
Gaps in tools are, migration, capacity planning, dynamic load optimisation, application matching, power management, chargeback. Should have systems backup, health monitoring mature and in place.
Consolidate, virtualised, automate, provision...

Server workload topology
BPM: ERP, CRM, OLTP, batch
Decision. Support: data warehousing, data mining, analysis
App dev:
IT infrastructure

convergence is the reigning idea, and will continue to be until IT shops are able to provide more transparent services to other business units
Scale matters in driving efficiencies
Volume economics count across the entire DC ecosystem, systems, facility, operations... Processing workload per kilowatt
Responsiveness to business drivers is more important to IT than lowering costs.
Last week, AMAZON cloud failures highlight the onus being on those who have outsourced their applications to do so responsibly. You get what you pay for, and you need to understand what you're buying and how it affects your service delivery.
Server hardware $52b, networking $62b, storage $32b
Sweet spot in the Market is convergence points between these, the application space, the SaaS space, converged infrastructure space.
Data centre needs for tomorrow
Evolutionary approach avoiding forklift upgrades
Integrated physical and virtual fabric switch management
DC convergence requiring process and management
Long term, dcs being discrete computing units.

Improved asset uptime
Faster time to Market
Flexible capacity planning
Bigger databases
Improved densities
Reduced operating costs

Pay attention to time, money, and people
Workloads are the critical pivot point for cloud and convergence decisions
increase collaboration and device usage versus traditional siloed approaches

Thinking differently about x86 and infrastructure convergence
Harsh Kachhy WW Product mrkting Mgr, IBM Blade Centre

Want to move staff to being value add instead of operational costs
Workload thinking, what's the best way to deploy any workload
Shared pools of resources, improve overall utilisation
Independent scaling of resources, just what we need, when we need it
Automated management of workloads

Virtual and physical convergence leads to increased management and automation, which leads to optimisation with integrated service management

Convergence realities and critical considerations
Interoperability with existing infrastructure.
Scaling without rip and replace or forklift upgrades
FCOE, 10GbE readiness
Single vendor lock in
Best of breed solutions
Secondary effects on my infrastructure

plugged IBM Systems Director and Tivoli as delivery a tightly integrated single pane of glass view to provide the insight into systems needed to get through consolidation and into the cloud.
A managed environment can save up to 40% in management costs.
VMControl free plugin to IBM systems Director, supports VMWare, KVM, HyperV, or Xen.
Link physical alerts to Vmotion, automatically migrate VMs from the failing server
Active Energy Manager
Open Fabric Manager, for blade chassis I/O configuration and failover management
Plugged Tivoli for automated provisioning and image management.
Private cloud using Tivoli tools, IBM Bladecentre Foundation for Cloud ( IaaS), or IBM cloudburst which provides self service portal. Curious about if you can select where the data is kept and or processed...
Talk turned to hardware
eX5 technology available in blade or rack format, claims to be the only x86 platform that delivers the memory tech that allows IO boosts, claim is 22% less expensive for virtualisation. Compared 1 HX5 + MAX5 against 2 HP BL490c

IT optimisation assessment benefit, no obligation to purchase anything, but complete audit of all systems, apps, and approach to virtualisation and consolidation.

BNT, an IBM company - importance of System Networking
Shailesh Naik, NA System x Networking, IBM System and Technology Group

Claim is that networking is the key to service simplification, virtualisation and automation, converged and virtual fabrics, high density computing, and reduced costs.
TCO can be lower with 2nd vendor instead of being dependent on just one, up to 20%
IBM is re-entering the network business by acquiring Blade Network technologies
BNT RackSwitch Portfolio in use by Akami, NYSE, and others.
Claims lowest latency, power consumption, compared favourably against Cisco
Claims twice the functionality, at half the price
Virtual fabric; 20Gb per server on a 10Gb connection to the rack
Appears to be a management layer ontop of your existing management. NMotion technology converged fabric management over Ethernet.
Presenting as a FCoE solution.

Future Vision of Blades
Harsh Kachhy

Described the purpose of the group Panel Discussion
Brent Mosbrook, Emulex
Ken Pierrehumbert, APC
Matt Eastwood, IDC

Discussed trends their respective companies are planning to bring to Market in conjunction with IBM.
10Gb on the MB for blades, moving the fabric closer to the processing.
APC plugged in-row cooling, and scalable power supply UPS, plus complete automation to feed the SPoG in tools like Tivoli
General DC trends from Matt, shifts in workload communication and collaboration, proliferation of more mobile computing p,affirms tethered more tightly to business networks. Forces outside of the dc increasing pressure to optimise, virtualise, consolidate, and increase efficiency of processing. Workload becomes more spiky and difficult to predict. Shift from code optimisation to data access and processing optimisation.

When it comes to server virtualisation, we are ahead of the global curve for densities, but in the top group in Vancouver/Canada. Claim is that few are using VMotion technology, used as plug for "NMotion"
PUE brought up to discuss with the small group. Made the point that as you increase virtualisation but don't scale back cooling or energy supply you are not improving your PUE.

Modular data centre concept brought up by Matt.

- Posted using BlogPress from my iPad

1 comment:

Gmar Consulting said...

Jason thanks for sharing your notes. Some interesting comments by yourself, and after being in IT for more than 33yrs, I always take words of vendors of HW/SW with a "grain of salt".